Search topics on this blog

Wednesday 3 March 2010

Steven Purcell

I regret the skepticism displayed over Steven Purcell's surprise resignation and his motives displayed by many commentators. Admittedly, the way he handled his legal and PR front is puzzling - perhaps explained by his being admitted to a drug and alcohol rehabilitation centre - but I am inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

Here's what I wrote about him last March. I still feel that way, and wish him well in his recovery. I hope he sees the light and changes his party to the SNP, but whatever he does, he will do it well and honourably.

Of course, I may be wrong and his critics right, and if so I will eat crow.

FROM MY ARCHIVE
Sunday, 15 March 2009
Sunday, Sunday - and Steven Purcell

Oh, the Labour Party! What it has become is both tragedy and farce. Someone should dramatise its decline and fall. It could tour the world, like Black Watch. Brian Cox could play Gordon Brown as a Lear-like figure, crying in the political wilderness. There would be parts for Iain Gray, for Wendy - tears (crocodile variety) would flow copiously ... Stop, stop! This is serious - I mustn't get carried away.

Among the ruins, however, I find wholly admirable Labour people, still alive and kicking, albeit a little damaged. Today, one of them, Steven Purcell, leader of Glasgow City Council, is in the news, for all the wrong reasons as far as Iain Gray and the Labour leadership are concerned.

He is the kind of young Glaswegian I recognise and celebrate. He was born in 1972 in Yoker. Now to men of my generation, born in the centre of Glasgow (E1) but living in Dalmuir, near Clydebank in the early 1960's, Yoker was a kind of frontier town, on the Clydebank/Glasgow border.

When the pubs shut at 9 o'clock (yes, my children, 9 o'clock) Yoker pubs, lawless and rumbustious, stayed open until well into the night - well, half-past nine, to be exact. With a fast car from Dalmuir - say a Hillman Imp - you could be thrown out of the Park Bar in Dalmuir at closing time and be in the Cawdor Vaults for a final swally before half-nine. When the Clydebank licensing laws changed to permit opening until 10 o'clock (oh, bliss!) we were all skint by 9.30 and had nowhere to go but home.

But our hero, Steven, missed all that. A 16-year old school leaver, and a YTS trainee in a building society, he was precocious politically, apparently (I look twice in astonishment) joining the Labour Party at 14 and being elected to Glasgow City Council, for the Blairdardie Ward, at the age of 23. He just rose and rose, being elected - unopposed - as Leader at the age of 32. That career path is not down to luck - it must be due to formidable ability and political nous, allied to superb people skills. And if all this was not enough, he seems like a genuinely nice guy. There is still hope for politics, and for Glasgow, if not for Labour.

It's such a pity you are in the wrong party, Steven, but you've got all the years ahead of you to see the light.

You will be a worthy opponent for Alex Salmond when the hapless Gray disappears. I look forward to the contrasting styles at First Minister's Questions. Good luck.

8 comments:

  1. You miss what I consider the most salient part of this saga (for Mr. Purcell's travails are after all personal) which is the behavior of the British Labour Party throughout all this.

    I find it baffling that not a single major figure in this party has come out to mention sympathy or support for someone who was (is?) supposed to be a rising star in that party. Not one to say that this kind of problem could happen to anyone and they are there if he needs them.

    Not ONE to say that he has done good work in the past and they "support him 110%".

    Interesting. It may (just possibly) say a great deal about that party and its leaders. Possibly.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks, Jeanne.

    I agree - they were gagged from offering a comment on his medical condition, but they could have wished him well. The online 'Scotsman' comments verged on the disgraceful. I attempted a defence, but was very much a lone voice..

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yep. The same applies to the blogs: only non-Labour ones can be found offering any support to the man. It seems the Macavity tendency is alive and well.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks, Colin.

    It is also regrettable that some online SNP supporters are attacking him. If it vital that we distinguish between the good guys and the bad guys in politics, whether they share our politics or not.

    I keep reminding such critics that the only route to an independent Scotland is to shift the allegiance of unionist voters, not preaching to the converted. That isn't achieved by abuse or blinkered opposition.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It looks Moridura that you better get the pressure cooker fired up.

    Tomorrow might be a day of denouement.

    If it is any solace I thought Purcell would return in a few years to set up a truly Independent Scottish Labour Party.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It seems a clear story now - chemical dpendency (on what?) and the end of a career.

    It doesn't change my view of the man - he gave his life to Glasgow, and the pressures forced him to reach for chemical help.

    I hope he recovers, gets back into politics, and I wish him well.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I suspect that it is much, much more.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well, it doesn't look good today. But beware of building theories of collapse of political parties on a scandal involving one man. Every major party has had them - and survived them. And all are vulnerable to them.

    But it is not good news for Labour in Glasgow, although just how much it will hurt them is open to question.

    I still feel sorry for Steven Purcell, and I still wish him well.

    ReplyDelete