Search topics on this blog

Google+ Badge

Showing posts with label Alex Neil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alex Neil. Show all posts

Friday, 21 October 2011

It’s that indy thing–ye cannae rattle a Nat

Every time Andrew Neil questions a Scottish Nationalist politician, it's worth 1000 votes for independence. Gordon Brewer knows, understands, but has to go through the motions of Paxo-like faux naivety.

But the metropolitan media just don't get it, and persist in the same ludicrous, simplistic questions.

You can't rattle a Nat, Andrew. Historical inevitability - and their country - is on their side. But keep it up, please, you're doing a fine job for the independence of your country - that was Scotland, wasn't it? Or is all that long forgotten?


Monday, 9 May 2011

Alex Neil on Andrew Neil - the Scottish election

The Twa Neils didn't actually meet heid tae heid, but given the choice of interviewer, I would have picked Anita too. In a straight heid-butting contest, my money would be on Alex. Soft, southern, metropolitan Scot against battle hardened home Scot - nae contest, nae problem ...

But Alex was the soul of reasonableness and objectivity today, with the easy magnanimity of the victor in a recent battle, but ready for an even bigger one ahead.

Gaun yersel, Alex ...


Wednesday, 23 February 2011

The strange face of Scottish Labour …

There will be a report on Newsnight Scotland tonight. This is the party that thinks it has a divine right to govern Scotland, and that Scots will vote for them no matter what ...

We'll see on May 5th at the Scottish Parliamentary elections.

Saor Alba!


Wednesday, 24 November 2010

The Scottish SVR tax–the facts

The constitutional power under the Scotland Act has not lapsed. What has lapsed is the fee to HMRC for collecting it.

£12m was paid by the Scottish Government in 1999 to set up the HMRC collection system.

The £50,000 per annum fee was for collection of tax.

No tax has been implemented

No tax has been raised

No party has proposed raising tax by the SVR.

The first time the Scottish government received the new demand for £7m to set up a new system by HMRC was in July 2010.

A meeting was immediately requested with HMRC by the Scottish Government to discuss this has been ignored by HMRC and no meeting has yet been offered.

The ability to raise the SVR tax has not lapsed: no constitutional power has been lost.

The Scottish Government simply declined to pay an excessive fee to HMRC for their services on a tax that no one intended to use.

There has never been a practical ability to use the SVR at short notice – it takes about 10 months to put the system in motion from the passage of the budget bill to HMRC actually being able to levy the tax.

The maintenance contract with HMRC came to an end in 2007, and not until July of 2010 was the matter raised again by HMRC , in the form of a sudden demand for £7m to update the system.

Why should the Scottish Government spends large sums of money, vital to Scotland in the face of the draconian cuts to its budget by the UK government, to finance a system that neither they nor the Opposition Parties in Holyrood intended to use?

That sum of money plays a vital part in essential services to the Scottish People. To pay it to HMRC, for a service that never has been used and never will be used (it is being replaced by new legislation) by the Scottish Government, or any other party, would be fiscal lunacy, and a dereliction of their duty to the Scottish people.

The Scottish SVR tax – some facts, and a warm-up last night for the main bout today at Holyrood


Newsnight Scotland gives some hard facts on the furore over the Scottish SVR tax debate that has been whipped up by the three Holyrood Opposition parties, with the Greens behaving strangely, apparently hell-bent on solving the entire deficit problem resulting from the UK ConLib cuts solely by taxing the Scottish people.

John Swinney will present the Government’s position in the Parliament today.

I found Andy Kerr's behaviour - accusing Alex Neil of lying - of lies, and deceit - quite disgraceful and unacceptable behaviour in a public debate. Alex Neil, being a robust and good-natured politician, will probably shrug it off. (I would have sought other remedies.)

There's hardball politics, and vigorous politics, but this contemptible showing is all too typical of Scottish Labour's gutter style.

Judge for yourself